Upton's Case
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtSikora, J.
An employee is not entitled to workers’ compensation benefits for an “emotional disability arising principally out of a bona fide, personnel action.” G. L. c. 152, § 1(7A), as inserted by St. 1986, c. 662, § 6. At issue in this case is whether a workplace investigatory interview causing employee Joseph Upton’s emotional disability constituted a bona fide personnel action within the meaning of § 1(7A) of the workers’ compensation act (act). An administrative judge of the Department of Industrial Accidents (department) concluded that it did and, accordingly, denied Upton’s claim. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Board of Education v. Assessor of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Hanlon v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Young v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Sullivan v. Town of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Finkelstein v. Board of Registration in OptometryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.