Legal Opinion

Upton's Case

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 18, 2013No. 12-P-325Published

1Opinion of the CourtSikora, J.

An employee is not entitled to workers’ compensation benefits for an “emotional disability arising principally out of a bona fide, personnel action.” G. L. c. 152, § 1(7A), as inserted by St. 1986, c. 662, § 6. At issue in this case is whether a workplace investigatory interview causing employee Joseph Upton’s emotional disability constituted a bona fide personnel action within the meaning of § 1(7A) of the workers’ compensation act (act). An administrative judge of the Department of Industrial Accidents (department) concluded that it did and, accordingly, denied Upton’s claim. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Assessor of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Hanlon v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Young v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Sullivan v. Town of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  5. Finkelstein v. Board of Registration in OptometryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API