Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Town of Brookline

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 14, 2001PublishedCited by 145 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

The plaintiff, a twenty-year retiree of the Brookline police department (department), raises two issues through his petition for reinstatement: first, what standard should apply in evaluating a retiree’s fitness to return to full employment; and second, whether a long-term retiree must complete retraining before becoming entitled to reinstatement. To answer these questions this court must interpret G. L. c. 32, § 8 (2), and G. L. c. 31, § 39. We conclude that G. L. c. 32, § 8 (2), compels reinstatement of retired employees once properly cleared by the retirement board, and a vacancy exists;…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. VickeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. O'Neill v. City ManagerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. White v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  5. McDonough v. Marr Scaffolding Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by145 opinions

  1. Harvard Crimson, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. Tyler v. Michaels Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  3. Sebago v. Boston Cab Dispatch, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  4. Okerman v. VA Software Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. Clerk-Magistrate of the West Roxbury Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003

140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API