Schaefer v. American States Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Judge:
This appeal arises from the orders of the trial court granting appellees’ motions for partial summary judgment with respect to a portion of appellants’ insurance claim. Because we conclude that the orders are interlocutory in nature, the appeal must be quashed.
The salient facts are these. On October 29, 1976, appellants brought an action in assumpsit against appellees, their insurance carriers,1 seeking compensation for certain losses allegedly due to vandalism. Specifically, the complaint averred that on November 14, 1975, one-half of a set of gates had been removed from…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- T. C. R. Realty, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Central Contracting Co. v. C. E. Youngdahl & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- GOLDMAN v. McShainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Praisner v. StockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Ecksel v. Orleans Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Canulli v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Garofolo v. ShahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Rohr v. Keystone InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.