Legal Opinion

Garofolo v. Shah

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1990No. 2467PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Barbara Garofolo instituted an action against Rajni C. Shah, D.D.S., to recover damages for an unanticipated result which followed the injection of a local anesthetic into her mouth. After discovery proceedings had been completed and in response to a defense motion for summary judgment, the trial court ascertained that Garofolo was unable to establish that Shah’s treatment fell below accepted dental standards. Because Garofolo was unable to prove a prima facie case of negligence, the trial court entered summary judgment in favor of Shah “on all issues except *458lack of informed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Praisner v. StockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Gordon v. GordonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Hardy v. Pennock Insurance Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Alessandro v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bloom v. DuBois Regional Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Motheral v. BurkhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Foflygen v. R. ZEMEL, MD (PC)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Dorohovich v. West American InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Trackers Raceway, Inc. v. Comstock Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API