Legal Opinion

Vanhoose v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 18, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Affirming.

Dan J. Yanhoose sued the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company for damages for the loss of a leg alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the company in failing to furnish him a reasonably safe place to work. A motion to require him to elect whether he. would prosecute the suit under the state law or under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act was. sustained,- and he .elected to proceed under the state law. .

A trial before a jury resulted in a verdict and judgment for $12,500.00. On appeal it was held that, as the evidence clearly showed that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Helm v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. PackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. VanhooseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Hyatt's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Culton v. NapierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. Creech Drug StoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  4. Louisville Nashville Railroad Co. v. RevermanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Hauck v. LillickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API