Legal Opinion

Hauck v. Lillick

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 17, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Richardson

Affirming.

This is the second presentation to us of this action. See Hauck et ux. v. Lillick et ux., 254 Ky. 6, 70 S. W. (2d) 958, 960.

The facts now contained in the record, except supplementary testimony to which we shall hereafter refer, are set out in our opinion on the first appeal. It is unnecessary to restate them. The issues then were and now are whether the writing involved was an option or an absolute contract of sale of the lot described in it, and whether the note evidencing the recited consideration therefor was signed on Sunday; the Lillicks…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Rowland's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Kentucky Road Oiling Co. v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Cornett's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Preece v. WoolfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Robinson v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zumwalt v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  2. Saunders v. Lincoln County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API