Helm v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Boyle Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Miller
Affirming.
On April 3rd, 1911, the appellant, Helm, was severely injured while in the service of the appellee. Helm was employed as a special agent or detective by the appellee, his duties requiring him, among other things, to inspect the seals of cars, broken cars, and cars which had been broken into.
At the time he received the injuries referred to, Helm was engaged in examining the seals on the ends of two ears which were coupled together in the yard of the appellee’s road in Danville. While examining the seals he was in between the two cars, with one foot…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cin., N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Harrod's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Robards v. P. Bannon Sewer Pipe Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. HockerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
- Slaughter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Age's Administrator v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Consolidated Coach Corporation v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Swann's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. GoldstonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Gregory's Administratrix v. Director General of RailroadsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Holloway's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.