Grossman v. Sendor
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLouis I. Kaplan, J.
According to the stipulated facts submitted by the parties, the defendants are the sole stockholders of Sendor Bindery, Inc., which employed members of the plaintiff union. Pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement between them, the corporation was to make payments, calculated as a percentage of the gross earnings of employees, to the union’s welfare, pension, and special displacement benefit trust funds, which had been established by separate agreements between the parties. Having apparently run into financial difficulties, the Bindery failed to pay to the funds $36,813.51 for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Embassy Restaurant, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Regnell v. PageNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- Corenti v. KulikNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Greenberg v. CorwinNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Murphy v. MeyerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934
3Cited by5 opinions
- Waldorf Associates, Inc. v. NevilleNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Grossman v. SendorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- In Re NargassansUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Gannone v. WittmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Ingvarsdottir v. Gaines, Gruner, Ponzini & Novick, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016