Legal Opinion
Regnell v. Page
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 19, 1975PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArnold L. Fein, J.
Motion by defendants to reargue that portion of their prior motion which sought vacatur of the order of attachment in this action, which was denied by order dated June 27, 1974, is deemed a motion for renewal and is granted. Upon reconsideration, the court adheres to its original determination sustaining the order of attachment.
Plaintiffs, as trustees of welfare and pension funds, sue to recover for the fraud of defendants in breach of collective bargaining and trust agreements which required defendants to make payments or contributions to such funds to provide benefits to employees based…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- American Reserve Insurance v. China InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carey v. SugarSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grossman v. SendorNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Trigo Hnos., Inc. v. Premium Wholesale Groceries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Gibor Associates v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. HandreNew York Supreme Court · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.