Legal Opinion

Corenti v. Kulik

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLouis G. Bruhn, J.

This is a motion on behalf of the plaintiffs, pursuant to rule 113 of the Buies of Civil Practice, for an order striking out defendants’ answer and directing the entry of summary judgment for plaintiffs.

The action involved was instituted by the plaintiffs under the provisions of section 71 of the Stock Corporation Law of the State of New York against the defendants as stockholders of Joe’s State Street, Inc., a stock corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York, for certain moneys which the corporation was obligated to pay to the plaintiffs pursuant to the terms…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hudak v. Hornell Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Bristor v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Rotnofsky v. Capitol Distributors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Greenberg v. CorwinNew York Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Waldorf Associates, Inc. v. NevilleNew York Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Grossman v. SendorNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Ingvarsdottir v. Gaines, Gruner, Ponzini & Novick, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API