Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Mecklenborg

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 2014No. 2012-1700PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Robert Paul Mecklenborg of Cincinnati, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0021203, was admitted to the Ohio bar in 1978.

{¶ 2} On February 13, 2012, relator, disciplinary counsel, filed a complaint alleging that Mecklenborg had been charged with operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (“OWI”) and subsequently made false declarations about the pendency of that action on his application to renew his driver’s license. In June 2012, the parties entered into a consent-to-discipline agreement pursuant to BCGD Proc.Reg. 11 and Gov.Bar R. V(ll)(A)(3)(c) in which they…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In re Complaint Against ResnickOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. RussellOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SimonOhio Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Amaddio and Wargo (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. RosenOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Macejko (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API