Legal Opinion

In re Complaint Against Resnick

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 2005No. 2005-2396PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

{¶ 1} This is an adjudication, pursuant to Gov.Jud.R. 11(2) through (4), of a formal disciplinary complaint filed against an incumbent justice of the Supreme Court of Ohio. In this circumstance, Gov.Jud.R. II(2)(B)(3)(a) provides that the Chief Justice of the Courts of Appeals shall convene the panel described in Gov.Jud.R. 11(4) to “hear and decide” the complaint. Gov.Jud.R. 11(4) provides that all members of the Supreme Court of Ohio are disqualified from hearing or determining any matter in the proceeding and that the Supreme Court shall be composed of a panel consisting of the Chief…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Honorable Daniel Lee BLOCK, Associate Juvenile Judge of the First Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. Doherty (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. MecklenborgOhio Supreme Court · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API