Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Simon
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1994No. 94-1814PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
On review, we agree with the board’s finding of facts, conclusions of law, and recommendation. Accordingly, we publicly reprimand respondent and tax costs to him.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents. Pfeifer, J., dissenting. I would dismiss the case.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Columbus Bar Ass'n v. DoughertyOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- Disciplinary Counsel v. MecklenborgOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- Disciplinary Counsel v. SimonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Macejko (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BillingsleyOhio Supreme Court · 2024