Legal Opinion

Chicago City Railway Co. v. McMeen

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1903PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the Branch Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Elbridge Hanecy, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ricks

This was an action on the case, begun on the 6th of January, 1892, by appellee, McMeen, against appellant, the Chicago City Railway Company, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been received by him on the 28th day of September, 1891, while a passenger on a street car belonging to and operated by appellant.

The original declaration alleged that the defendant “was possessed of, using and operating a certain street railroad extending through the said city of Chicago, from the corner of State and Lake streets, in the said city, and southward along the said State street to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Fish v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Wabash Western Railway Co. v. FriedmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. WieczorekIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Swift & Co. v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Milauskis v. Terminal RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Carlin v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Shaw v. DorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Boudreaux v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Gillmore v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1906

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API