Commonwealth Ex Rel. Siani v. City of Wilkes-Barre
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Reno, J.,
Appellants instituted mandamus to compel the City of Wilkes-Barre and the members of its council to re instate them as active members of the paid fire department, and for the payment of their bi-weekly salaries of $109.58. The defendants filed an unverified pleading captioned “Preliminary Objection to Complaint” which in its text is actually a motion for a “Rule on the plaintiffs above-named to show cause why judgment should not be entered for the defendants because the Complaint filed- by the above-named plaintiffs did not state a cause of action.” This seems to have been…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Boyle v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Langan v. Pittston School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Cain, Admrx. v. StuckerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wilson v. Town of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Soltis AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Wagner v. Connecticut Personnel Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Allen v. West Mifflin BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Mulhern v. McHenryConnecticut Superior Court · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.