Legal Opinion

McIlvaine v. Pennsylvania State Police

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1972No. 282 C.D. 1971PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Bowman,

In this mandamus action we had heretofore dismissed the Commonwealth’s preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer because it was not entirely clear and free from doubt that plaintiff had failed to state a cause of action. McIlvaine v. State Police, 3 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 478 (1971). In doing so, we observed that plaintiff was faced with the formidable task of proving the statute in question to be arbitrary or discriminatory. It is now before us on the merits after defendant’s answer to the complaint and the filing of a stipulation of facts entered into…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boyle v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Soltis AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. McIlvaine v. State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Fischer v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. McIlvaine v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Mahoney v. TrabuccoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  4. Weisbrod v. LynnDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
  5. O'NEIL v. BaineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API