Orris v. Claudio
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
We agree with the view taken by the majority of the Court of Appeals. It is beyond cavil that it is the public policy of this state that, unless there is an express rejection of uninsured motorist coverage by an insured, his automobile liability policy must provide such type of coverage. Abate v. Pioneer Mutual Cas. Co. (1970), 22 Ohio St. 2d 161.
The case law in this state has generally pointed out that insurance companies could not lawfully insert provisions in uninsured motorist sections of the policy which would restrict *142coverage in a manner contrary to the intent of the statute. As an…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Abate v. Pioneer Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
- Curran v. State Automobile Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
- Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Bartlett v. Nationwide Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ady v. West American InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Kish v. Central National Insurance GroupOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- John Harold Wolfe v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Auto-Owners Mutual Insurance v. LewisOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Stanton v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.