Legal Opinion

Saltzer v. Reckord

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 1935No. Appeal, 16PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages from defendant, a physician, for injuries received when an appliance in the doctor’s office called a sterilizer, filled with boiling water, was upset, scalding him severely. After a verdict in plaintiff’s favor for $5,000, the court entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

Appellant, who had been sick with the grippe for two or three weeks, went to defendant’s office by appointment for the purpose of having a general physical examination. The doctor’s quarters consisted of several rooms. For the first…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robb v. Niles-Bement-Pond Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Woodruff v. Painter & EldridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Stemons v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. McCandless v. McWhaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  5. Sinn v. Farmers Deposit Savings BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Duckworth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Bierstein v. WhitmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. United States ex rel. Fear v. RundleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  5. Blankenship v. Baptist Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API