Legal Opinion

Bierstein v. Whitman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 1948No. Appeal, 191PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

This is an action in trespass against a dentist to recover damages because of alleged negligent professional treatment. The court below entered a compulsory nonsuit which it refused to take off. This appeal followed.

Considering the testimony in the light most favorable to the plaintiff the facts are. as follows: The defendant is a dentist , who resides and practices his profession in the Borough of Camp Hill, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania. On January 24, 1942, the plaintiff went to defendant’s office for a dental examination. The defendant determined…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Duckworth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Williams v. LeBarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  3. Stemons v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. McCandless v. McWhaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  5. Moscicki Et Ux. v. ShorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Toogood v. RogalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Draper v. Airco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  3. Smith v. YoheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Lentino v. Fringe Employee Plans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  5. Storm v. GoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API