Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Brunenkant v. Wallace

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1940No. 28327PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The controlling inquiry is whether the petition is subject to a general demurrer. The sufficiency of relators’ pleading depends upon whether the allegations of fact show that a ministerial duty rests upon the respondent which he has failed to perform and of which this court will compel performance by a writ of mandamus.

The following statutory provisions are pertinent:

Section 6290, General Code. “Definition of terms, as used in this chapter and in the penal laws, except as otherwise provided:

“1. ‘Vehicle’ means everything on wheels or runners, except vehicles operated exclusively on rails or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Struble v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Fisher Bros. Co. v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. State Ex Rel. Greenward Realty Co. v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State Ex Rel. Yontz v. WestOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Outcalt v. GuckenbergerOhio Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Jackman v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Akron Transportation Co. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Graf v. WarrenOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State Ex Rel. Walls v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API