State Ex Rel. Brunenkant v. Wallace
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The controlling inquiry is whether the petition is subject to a general demurrer. The sufficiency of relators’ pleading depends upon whether the allegations of fact show that a ministerial duty rests upon the respondent which he has failed to perform and of which this court will compel performance by a writ of mandamus.
The following statutory provisions are pertinent:
Section 6290, General Code. “Definition of terms, as used in this chapter and in the penal laws, except as otherwise provided:
“1. ‘Vehicle’ means everything on wheels or runners, except vehicles operated exclusively on rails or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Struble v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1937
- Fisher Bros. Co. v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Greenward Realty Co. v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Yontz v. WestOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Outcalt v. GuckenbergerOhio Supreme Court · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Jackman v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Akron Transportation Co. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1951
- Graf v. WarrenOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Walls v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1941