State Ex Rel. Walls v. Wallace
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
While the capacity of the relatrix to maintain this action is not wholly free from doubt, we believe such right should be recognized under the holdings and language in a number of cases decided by this court. See State, ex rel. Downing, Pros. Atty., v. Powers, Chief of Div. of Securities, 125 Ohio St., 108, 110, 180 N. E., 647, 648, and cases therein cited; State, ex rel. Struble, v. Davis et al., Tax Commission, 135 Ohio St., 593, 595, 22 N. E. (2d), 81, 82; 25 Ohio Jurisprudence, 1163, Section 222 et seq.; 34 American Jurisprudence, 870, Section 81 et seq.
We approach consideration of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Continental Baking Co. v. WoodringSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Smallwood v. JeterIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Ex Parte IratacableNevada Supreme Court · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Downing v. PowersOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Struble v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rapa v. HainesMontgomery County Court of Common Pleas · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Stubbs v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1942