Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Outcalt v. Guckenberger
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1938No. 27083PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
This action in mandamus, originating in this court, was instituted by the state of Ohio, on the relation of Dudley Miller Outcalt, prosecuting attorney of Hamilton county, Ohio, against George Guckenberger, auditor of Hamilton county, and Joseph Berning, treasurer of that county, as respondents, to compel them to charge real estate and certain property other than real estate, on which taxes are delinquent, with the penalties, interest and other charges as provided by Section 5678, General Code, and kindred sections.
The relator challenges the constitutionality of the Whittemore Acts which are…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Society for the Propagation of the Gospel v. WheelerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1814
- Ohio Oil Co. v. ConwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Jones v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Struble v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1937
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Haskins v. BiasOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Toledo City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. State Bd. of Edn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State Ex Rel. Brunenkant v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- State v. Acme Scrap Iron & MetalOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Evatt v. SemoninOhio Supreme Court · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.