Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Yontz v. West

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1939No. 27540PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

It should be noted first that certain questions are not before this' court for consideration. The respondent is not 'complaining about the allowance of the writ of mandamus. Nor does he object to the amount of the attorney’s fee and expenses allowed, or to the authority of the Court of Appeals to tax the costs against him. Likewise, he concedes the capacity of the relator to institute this action. His only complaint in this court is set forth in the following four sentences in his brief:

“However, it is submitted and we respectfully contend that there is no authority for the granting of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Council of Village of Bedford v. State Ex Rel. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Fisher Bros. Co. v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. State Ex Rel. Ach v. BradenOhio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ebke v. Board of Educational Lands & FundsNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. State Ex Rel. Williams v. MusgraveIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State Ex Rel. Brunenkant v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Akron-Canton Chapter, American Subcontractors Ass'n v. Ohio Department of Administrative ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State Ex Rel. Stubbs v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API