Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Landucci

California Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1962No. S. F. 20989PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Defendant Bertha Alice Landucci, hereinafter called defendant, appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, in an action to recover for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff was riding in an automobile driven by defendant. Plaintiff bases her action on two separate theories: (1) that she was a passenger for consideration in defendant’s automobile; and (2) that defendant was guilty of wilful misconduct. Defendant, although conceding her simple negligence, contends that the evidence is insufficient to support a recovery upon either theory. For reasons…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Nault v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lysick v. WalcomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Posz v. BurchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Owens v. PyeattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Spring v. LilesOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Powers v. HatcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API