Legal Opinion

Bankers Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. Terry

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1950No. 6 Div. 905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

This is a suit to recover on a policy of insurance wherein the defendant insured the plaintiff’s automobile against loss or damage by theft, etc.

In the court below the judge, sitting without a jury, rendered judgment in favor of the insured.

The pertinent provisions of the policy are:

Under Coverage:

“D-l-Theft (Broad Form)
“Loss of or damage to the automobile caused by theft, larceny, robbery or pilferage.”

Under Exclusions:

“(g) under coverages, A, D-l, and D-2 to loss due to .conversion, embezzlement or secretion by any person in lawful possession of the automobile under a bailment…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Van Vechten v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Murphree v. HansonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Illinois Automobile Ins. Exch. v. Southern Motor Sales Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Hartford Fire Insurance v. WimbishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  5. Home Ins. Co. of New York v. TrammellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chemstrand Corp. v. Maryland Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Eiswirth Construction & Equipment Co. v. Glenn Falls InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BarrowCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  4. Hayes v. Financial Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Bates v. KurttsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API