Legal Opinion

Home Ins. Co. of New York v. Trammell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 11, 1935No. 6 Div. 707PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The action is on a policy of automobile insurance, indemnifying the owner against loss from “theft, robbery and pilferage.”

The owner, Ross Trammell, employed a negro youth, Alfred Murphy, to take the car to a water hydrant, a few hundred feet away, and wash and simonize it.

The key, together with rags and simonizing material, was handed to Murphy, who drove the ear to the hydrant, and proceeded to wash and simonize it as agreed. He was in sight of the owner’s place of business. An hour or two later Mr. Trammell found his car about a mile away, ditched and damaged, alongside…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Van Vechten v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Illinois Automobile Ins. Exch. v. Southern Motor Sales Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Goforth v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Federal Insurance v. HiterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Crocheron v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Indemnity Fire Corp. v. AldridgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. Chemstrand Corp. v. Maryland Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. Zielke v. Amsouth Bank, N.A.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  4. Canal Insurance Company v. StidhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  5. Eiswirth Construction & Equipment Co. v. Glenn Falls InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API