Legal Opinion
In Re Alexander
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 8, 1968No. 3761 OrigPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Chief Judge:
Don Morrow, having been charged with disorderly conduct 1 by information filed by the Corporation Counsel of the District of Columbia, was brought for trial before Respondent, a judge of the Court of General Sessions, then sitting in the Criminal Division of that court. After the witness had been sworn but before any testimony had been received, counsel for Morrow moved to dismiss the information on the ground that the Corporation Counsel was not the proper prosecutor of the alleged offense. 2 Respondent granted the motion to dismiss. Morrow’s counsel then moved that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Blanchard McLeod United States of America v. Dallas CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. KalishDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Mavity v. TyndallIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Don Morrow v. District of Columbia, in the Matter of Harry T. Alexander, Judge, District of Columbia Court of General SessionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Monroe v. Middlebury Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- In the Matter of AlexanderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
- Don Morrow v. District of Columbia, in the Matter of Harry T. Alexander, Judge, District of Columbia Court of General SessionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Monroe v. Middlebury Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982