Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Alexander

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1969No. 3761 OrigPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The facts of this case are fully set forth in our previous opinion in In re Alexander, D.C.App., 243 A.2d 901 (1968). An appeal from our decision was allowed by the United States Court of Appeals, and that court reversed and remanded to us for further proceedings. Morrow v. District of Columbia, and In the Matter of Alexander, D.C.Cir., 417 F.2d 728 (1969). All parties have been given the opportunity of filing briefs and presenting oral argument on the remand.

The holding of the United States Court of Appeals, so far as pertinent here, was “that the Court of General Sessions does have the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Don Morrow v. District of Columbia, in the Matter of Harry T. Alexander, Judge, District of Columbia Court of General SessionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  2. In Re AlexanderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nancy Sullivan v. C. Francis Murphy, Corporation Counsel of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. John Doe v. William H. Webster, Director, FbiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  3. Jackie E. Utz v. Honorable Maurice CullinaneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  4. District of Columbia v. HudsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Spock v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API