Legal Opinion

Monroe v. Middlebury Conservation Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 29, 1982PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParskey, J.

On April 22, 1980, the named plaintiff, as nominee for a partnership known as “Aqua-venture,” submitted an application to the defendant Middlebury conservation commission for final review of a proposal to install two recharge basins, commonly referred to as aquifers, in 32 ± acres of land owned by the plaintiffs in Middlebury, a por*478tion of which land is subject to regulation as an inland wetland. The conservation commission is designated as the inland wetland agency for the town of Middlebury. The installation of these basins would permit the plaintiffs to test the potential yield of some…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Favorite v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  2. RK Development Corp. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  3. Helbig v. Zoning Commission of Noank Fire DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. Heimov v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  5. Beach v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Pamela B. v. MentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Doe v. MaherConnecticut Superior Court · 1986
  3. Leo Fedus & Sons Construction Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. West Hartford Taxpayers Assn., Inc. v. StreeterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Franc v. Bethel Holding Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API