Legal Opinion
Arkansas AFL-CIO v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 7, 1993No. 92-1115PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge, with whom FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge, BOWMAN, MAGILL and LOKEN, Circuit Judges, join.
This appeal arises from the. Federal Communications Commission’s (“FCC”) refusal to apply the fairness doctrine to KARK-TV (“KARK”1). The FCC ruled that the fairness doctrine was not statutorily mandated, and was no longer in the public intérest. Based on this determination, the FCC dismissed a fairness doctrine complaint filed by the Arkansas AFL-CIO and The Committee Against Amendment 2 (collectively “Committee”). A panel of this court affirmed. Arkansas AFL-CIO v. FCC, 980…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- HealthEast Bethesda Lutheran Hospital & Rehabilitation Center v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Federico v. Lincoln Military Housing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Healtheast Bethesda Lutheran Hospital v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- (PC) Zaiza v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Arkansas Afl-Cio v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.