Legal Opinion

(PC) Zaiza v. Clark

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 18, 2021No. 1:19-cv-01476Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JOSE ROBERTO ZAIZA, 1:19-cv-01476-DAD-GSA-PC 10 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 11 Plaintiffs, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE PROCEED WITH PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS 12 vs. AGAINST DEFENDANTS CLARK, GALLAGER, AND BAUGHMAN FOR 13 CLARK, et al., INUFFICIENT ACCESS TO OUT-OF- CELL EXERCISE IN VIOLATION OF 14 Defendants. THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT, AND THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND 15 DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 16 FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE 17 OBJECTIONS 18 19 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 20 Jose Roberto Zaiza…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API