Legal Opinion
Baker v. City of Santa Monica
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 30, 1986No. B015599PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MILLS, J. *
Defendants and appellants City of Santa Monica and the Santa Monica Rent Control Board (Board), and plaintiffs, respondents and cross-appellants John J. Stein and James W. Baker appeal from a judgment upholding Board’s standards for determining rent increases, but permanently enjoining defendants and appellants from “regulating or prohibiting, directly or indirectly, demolitions of controlled rental housing.”
Factual and Procedural Background
On April 10, 1979, the City of Santa Monica (City), responding to a housing crisis in which much of its rental stock had been razed, by…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lena R. Schnuck v. City of Santa MonicaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- TG Oceanside, L.P. v. City of OceansideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Vega v. City of West HollywoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Apartment Ass'n of Greater Los Angeles v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- City of Berkeley v. City of Berkeley Rent Stabilization BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.