City of Berkeley v. City of Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERSON, P. J.
The ultimate legal question presented in this litigation is this: Did the City of Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board (Board) abuse its discretion, by exceeding the authority and powers imposed by its enabling ordinance, when it adopted new regulations it contends were designed to avoid unconstitutional confiscatory effects on landlords and to ensure landlords fair and reasonable levels of rents producing a fair return on their investment, as our Supreme Court has ruled to be constitutionally required? We will hold, in partially affirming and partially reversing the lower…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Carson Mobilehome Park Owners' Ass'n v. City of CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. City of Carson Mobilehome Park Rental Review BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- H.N. & Frances C. Berger Foundation v. City of EscondidoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Donohue v. Santa Paula West Mobile Home ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Home Builders Assn. v. City of NapaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- City of San Jose v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.