Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Sponier

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 9706PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Porter Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

This suit was commenced in the Lake ■Circuit Court and ivas taken to the Porter Circuit Court by •change of venue.

It was brought by John Sponier and Catherine, his wife, ■for injuries sustained by Catherine by the wrongful act of the 'defendant in placing a hand-car on a bridge, which was part ■ of a highway crossing a ditch within the limits of the defend- . ant’s right of way.

The complaint alleged that the defendant, on a dark night, 'negligently, wrongfully, unlawfully and wilfully put the hand- • car on the bridge, so that a team could not pass over the bridge, ;-and that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi R. W. Co. v. CollarnIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. City of Delphi v. LoweryIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Wright v. ComptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Colee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. City of Indianapolis v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co v. WynantIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. City of Goshen v. EnglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Vandalia Coal Co. v. YemmIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HendricksIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API