CONTINENTAL COFFEE COMPANY v. Estate of Clark
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Collins, J.:
This appeal is from a judgment of the lower court refusing to allow filing of a late creditor’s claim in a probate proceeding. We hold that there was no abuse of discretion in the ruling and affirm the judgment.
The late Wilbur I. Clark had, during his lifetime, guaranteed payment upon demand of four promissory notes payable to Continental Coffee Company, an Illinois corporation. The different corporate makers of those four promissory notes were business associates of Clark. The sums due on the notes totaled approximately $72,000.
Clark, a resident of Nevada,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- New York Merchandise Co. v. StoutWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Chalaby v. DriskellOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Gardner Hotel Supply of Houston v. Estate of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1967
- Pruett v. CaddiganNevada Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by10 opinions
- William B. Tanner Co. v. Estate of FesslerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Palazzi v. Estate of GardnerOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Williams v. GrossmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Baker National Bank v. HendersonMontana Supreme Court · 1968
- Brunell Leasing Corporation v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.