Legal Opinion

Chalaby v. Driskell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1964PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

Plaintiff filed a claim against the estate of William E. Driskell to recover on three promissory notes executed by the decedent. Defendant disallowed the claim. The present action was brought against defendant individually and as administrator of the decedent’s estate. Plaintiff prayed for (1) a judgment allowing his claim, (2) -an order invalidating a claim against the estate filed by defendant, (3) a decree impressing a trust in favor of plaintiff upon $12,935 defendant paid to himself on his own claim, and (á) for general equitable relief.

The case was tried without a jury. under ORS…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. In Re Estate of PierceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  4. New York Merchandise Co. v. StoutWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. In Re Shew's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Palazzi v. Estate of GardnerOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Williams v. GrossmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Estate of Busch v. Ferrell-Duncan Clinic, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  5. Baker National Bank v. HendersonMontana Supreme Court · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API