Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Village of Plymouth

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 16, 1968No. 41425PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

This matter is before the court on a motion by plaintiff to dismiss the defendants’ appeal. Defendants have countered with a petition for a writ of prohibition or for leave to secure a discretionary review under Rule 105, Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure.

This action has been brought to recover damages arising out of plaintiff’s discharge from his position as a police officer with the village of Plymouth. The issues are (1) the appealability of orders appointing a representative of the village to sit on a review panel for the purpose of making findings and recommendations…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Laufman v. Hall-Mack Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maietta v. GreenfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  2. Miyoi v. Gold Bond Stamp Co. Employees Retirement TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Johnson v. Village of PlymouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. City of Rochester v. KottschadeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API