Legal Opinion
Maietta v. Greenfield
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 7, 1972No. [No. 75, September Term, 1972.]PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtScanlan, J.
In this case, we are asked to consider an appeal (a) prematurely taken, (b) which proves in fact to have been unnecessary, and (c) which asks that this Court advise the court below concerning matters upon which the opposing parties are now in agreement. Such a meritless resort to the appellate process must be dismissed under Rule 835 a 2. This we do, for the reasons now stated.
Appellants, Dennis Maietta and Frank Maietta, d/b/a Maietta Trucking Co. and Maietta Trucking Contractors (hereinafter referred to as “Maietta”) are a Pennsylvania partnership. Maietta is a subcontractor working on a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rocks v. BrosiusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Matter of Hosiery Mfrs. Corp. v. . GoldstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Dewart v. Northeastern Gas Transmission Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Chillum-Adelphi Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. v. Button & Goode, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Gold Coast Mall, Inc. v. Larmar Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Crown Oil and Wax Co. of Delaware, Inc. v. Glen Construction Co. of Virginia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Bel Pre Medical Center, Inc. v. Frederick Contractors, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Charles J. Frank, Inc. v. Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Horsey v. HorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.