Legal Opinion
Dye v. Sachs (In Re Flashcom, Inc.)
District Court, C.D. California
Decided April 16, 2004No. Bankruptcy No. SA 00-10215 JR, Adversary No. SA 02-1620-JRPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN E. RYAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
I.INTRODUCTION
After filing a chapter 11 1 petition, Flashcom, Inc. (“Debtor”) filed a plan of reorganization that was confirmed on December 11, 2001. Debtor’s plan made Carolyn Dye (“Trustee”) liquidating trustee for Debtor’s estate.
On July 11, 2002, Trustee filed a complaint (the “Complaint”) against the defendants listed above (“Defendants”). Defendants filed a motion for partial summary judgment (the “Motion”), asserting that the California Corporations Code (“CCC”) does not apply to the claims asserted in the Complaint as a matter of law.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Atherton v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El SegundoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Jensen v. Johnson County Youth Baseball LeagueDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kruss v. BoothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Friese v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Dye v. Sachs (In re Flashcom, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2013