Legal Opinion
Sauceda v. Kerlin
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided July 7, 2005No. 13-01-00062-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice HINOJOSA.
Appellants, descendants of Juan Jose Balli (“Balli Claimants”), sued appellees, Gilbert Kerlin, individually and as trustee, Windward Oil and Gas Corporation, and P.I. Corporation (“Kerlin Group”), for: (1) breach of contract; (2) breach of fiduciary duty; (3) fraud; and (4) conspiracy to commit fraud and breach of fiduciary duty. The Balli Claimants also asked for a declaratory judgment, an accounting, and the imposition of a constructive trust. See Tex.R. Civ. P. 274; Morales v. Morales, 98 S.W.3d 343, 346 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2003, pet. denied). After…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Kerlin v. SaucedaTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Angell v. Bailey, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2007
- Thomas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2007
- Shepard v. BeckWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Exxon Corp. v. Miesch, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.