Legal Opinion

Keller v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 16, 1963No. 20772PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pringle

The plaintiff in error will be referred to as the defendant and the defendant in error will be referred to as the People.

Defendant was found guilty of burglary by a jury in the trial court and brings error to review the judgment of conviction entered on the verdict. He urges the following grounds for reversal:

I. That the trial court lacked jurisdiction to hear the instant case due to the fact that more than two terms of court had expired between information being filed and trial.

II. That the trial court erred in refusing to grant defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the conclusion of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Randolph v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Militello v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  3. Davis v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  4. People v. HambletonIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Hicks v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. PinyatelloSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. People v. SteeleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  3. Goddard v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  4. People v. MingoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  5. Chambers v. District Court in & for Cty. of ArapahoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API