Legal Opinion
Gipner v. State Civil Service Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 4, 1936No. Civ. No. 5493PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to a petition for a writ of certiorari on the ground that the petition fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The petition alleges that Bailey D. Gipner is a permanent civil service employee who was designated as manager of the division of state employment agencies of the department of industrial relations, under the supervision of W. A. Granfield, at the city of Stockton. November 22, 1934, written charges for his removal were preferred against him under the provisions of section 14 of the Civil Service Act of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Suckow v. AldersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Matter of HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Dyment v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Anderson v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Erickson v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Hostetter v. AldersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Fickeisen v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Cook v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Aluisi v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.