Legal Opinion

Kirkham v. Moore

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 1903No. 4,231PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Hancock Circuit Court; E. W. Felt, Judge. Suit by Nellie Moore and busband against Richard T. Kirkham and another for the specific performance of a contract to convey real estate. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRoby, C. J.

Action to obtain specific performance of a contract to convey real estate. The complaint was filed November 28, 1900. December 8, 1900, appellant Kirk-ham conveyed the real estate to his co-appellant the Terre Haute Brewing Company. Eebruary 19, 1901, an amended complaint in two paragraphs was filed, the brewing company being made a party defendant. Special findings of fact were made and conclusions of law stated thereon to the effect that appellees were entitled to the specific performance of the agreement made by appellant Kirkham; that the brewing company, as his grantee, was bound by his…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Kirby v. TallmadgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Smith v. GaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. City of South Bend v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. McLean v. ClappSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Mining Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rogers v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. First National Bank v. PeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Wilson v. TevisIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Hirschman v. Marion County Plan CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Michalski v. United StatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API