Legal Opinion

Michalski v. United States

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 27, 1958PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

49 N.J. Super. 104 (1958)

139 A.2d 324

GEORGE MICHALSKI AND ANGELINA MICHALSKI, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BUILDERS LUMBER & SUPPLY COMPANY, ROLAND BOUCHER AND PHYLLIS BOUCHER, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided February 27, 1958.

Messrs. George A. Cella and Rhea A. Mudge, attorneys of plaintiffs.

Mr Peter T. Bacsik, attorney of defendant Builders Lumber & Supply Company.

Mr. Herman D. Ringle, attorney of defendant Division of Employment Security of Department of Labor & Industry of New Jersey.

Mr. Chester A. Weidenburner, attorney of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wood v. PriceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  2. Wickes v. LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Lessee of Billington v. WelshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1812
  4. Peck v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. LaCombe v. HeadleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Friendship Manor, Inc. v. GreimanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  2. Baghdikian v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of RamseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  3. C.J. Kowasaki, Inc. v. StateNew Jersey Tax Court · 1993
  4. Matter of Investors Funding Corp. of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  5. Brighton Const., Inc. v. L & J ENTERPRISES, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API