Legal Opinion
United States v. Broussard
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 14, 2010No. 09-10331PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
We consider how convictions for contempt of court are classified for sentencing purposes in the wake of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).
Facts
This case arises from Deante Broussard’s third supervised release violation. But the story starts much earlier, when he was released following his first supervised release violation. One of the terms of Broussard’s second round of supervised release required him to reside in twenty-four-hour lockdown at a halfway house in Oakland. The day Broussard arrived at the halfway house, he tried…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Lali Sorrentino PimentelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael David CARPENTER, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Human Life of Washington, Inc. v. Chair Bill BrumsickleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Juror Number OneDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Many Cultures, One Message v. ClementsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
- Human Life of Washington, Inc. v. Chair Bill BrumsickleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.