Legal Opinion
Human Life of Washington, Inc. v. Chair Bill Brumsickle
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 12, 2010No. 09-35128PublishedCited by 138 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:
“[T]he people in our democracy are entrusted with the responsibility for judging and evaluating the relative merits of conflicting arguments. They may consider, in making their judgment, the source and credibility of the advocate.” —First National Bank v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765, 791-92, 98 S.Ct. 1407, 55 L.Ed.2d 707 (1978) (footnotes omitted)
Human Life of Washington (“Human Life”), a nonprofit, pro-life advocacy corporation, appeals the district court’s denial of summary judgment in its suit against various Washington state officials. 1 Human Life challenges, on…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- Thalheimer v. City of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Steve Cooksey v. Michelle FutrellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- National Organization for Marriage v. McKeeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Center for Individual Freedom v. MadiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Farris v. SeabrookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.