Legal Opinion
Many Cultures, One Message v. Clements
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided November 8, 2011No. 3:10-cv-05253-KLSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS
KAREN L. STROMBOM, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ. P.”) 56. The parties have consented to have this matter heard by the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 and Local Rule MJR 13. After having reviewed plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, defendants’ response to that motion, plaintiffs’ reply thereto and the remaining…
2Cases cited148 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bailey v. Maine Commission on Governmental EthicsDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2012
- Republican Party of New Mexico v. KingDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021