Legal Opinion

Marangi v. Domenici

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1958No. Civ. 23085PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment quieting in plaintiff title to a certain easement, enjoining obstruction of same and awarding damages for prior interference with its use. Appellants do not complain of the injunction or the amount of damages or method of computing the same. They urge reversible error in the adjudication of ownership by plaintiff of the easement in question. The claim is insufficiency of the evidence. There is little conflict therein and the evidence at those points of conflict must be construed most favorably to respondent. (Nichols v. Mitchell, 32 Cal.2d 598, 600 [197 P.2d…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. New v. NewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Baldwin v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Jones v. HarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Fobbs v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Medina v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Snyder v. Shoen CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API