Scott v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ANNUNZIATA, Judge.
Following a jury trial, appellant, Tyrone Christopher Scott, was convicted of second degree murder and robbery. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in limiting the scope of his cross-examination of one of the Commonwealth’s witnesses on the issue of that witness’ bias or motive to testify. We find that the trial court erred, but, under the facts of this case, we find the error to have been harmless and affirm appellant’s convictions.
I
Zenobia Jones and Tamika Young testified for the Commonwealth concerning the events in question. They testified that Jones, Young,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lavinder v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- Jenkins v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
- Whittaker v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- Clagett v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Williams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
- Cousins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
- Piscitelli v. the Salesian SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Dean v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
- Jose Vidal Pereira v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.