Piscitelli v. the Salesian Society
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUBIN, J.
Defendant The Salesian Society (the Society) appeals from the judgment entered after a jury determined it was negligent for failing to protect plaintiff Joseph Piscitelli from childhood sexual abuse at the hands of one of the Society’s priests. We reject the Society’s contention that the trial court erred by admitting evidence of another cleric’s sex abuse conviction in order to impeach that cleric’s testimony, and therefore affirm the judgment.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In July 2006 a jury awarded Joseph Piscitelli $600,000 for sexual abuse he suffered from 1969 through 1971…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. ClairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. McCaughanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ayala v. Antelope Valley Newspapers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014
- Ayala v. Antelope Valley Newspapers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014
- Bowman v. Adams & Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Estate of El WardaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- People v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2024